小王射飛鏢。

 

今天由於ESPN剛好有轉播所以看了一下這場。

好消息

1.速度在92-95mph之間

2.位置放得好能解決打者

3.偶爾會連續出來幾個quality pitch,是一時抓到感覺或碰巧連在一起的無法確認

壞消息

1.最晚從第一局對Bay的第一球就可以確認他沒有任何瞄準點的能力,只能往大區域丟,一壓低就極低,提高就飛去好球帶頂端,因此出現大量遠離好球帶的壞球。

2.位置稍微差一點或速度慢一點就被敲得頗solid

雜消息

1.伸卡是否有過往威力由於控球問題無法很有效判斷,但從壞消息的第二點來看不是太樂觀。

2.視覺上的確覺得他本來movement就非常小的伸卡變得更小了,不過這未必是好或壞。

結論

目前他仍然沒有能力擔任先發投手,下一場先發如果沒有至少一定程度的提昇就很糟糕。

 

雖然我的網路有問題沒辦法看太多東西,但是從幾個看過的地方知道好像台灣有很大的聲音說洋基不尊重兩年十九勝的王建民,不給他清楚定位不拉不拉不拉,ㄏㄏㄏ。王事件裡有些東西可以談,但說什麼定位不清楚和不尊重,還是只能ㄏㄏㄏ了。或許可以點幾首歌,例如曹格的世界唯一的你,或劉德華的我的心只能容納你之類的來聽聽。

創作者介紹
創作者 andrenomo 的頭像
andrenomo

The Tornado

andrenomo 發表在 痞客邦 留言(7) 人氣()


留言列表 (7)

發表留言
  • hydejing
  • 我也是認為很小的MOVE
    不過我剛去GAMEBDAY看
    很多是4S只有93 幾顆是SINKER
    如果是這樣的話
    那她的91-93的SINKER怎麼不見了?

    ANYWAY 4S有到95表示還OK速度有出來
    至於控球就要加強ㄌ
  • 因為那是gameday

    andrenomo 於 2009/06/11 20:55 回覆

  • hydejing
  • high 90s
    with a 70 curve
    pitcher
    first round darft

    what a talent come again

    after kerry wood, verlander,

    hope he will get injuru in Was National due to Inverted L

    i hope andrew can explore this young talent !

    cheers
  • Dorasaga
  • Teddy,

    The post by 瘦菊 is saying that Wang should NOT ONLY RELY on his sinkers, but use more flexible pitching strategy.

    It's not about giving up on anything.
    = =
  • 借這篇來回
    先跟Teddy sorry一下誤刪了post
    雖然說回覆和刪除icon連在一起但連續手殘按歪又壓到enter也是了不起

    回到主題
    practically everything in that article is wrong, big time
    that's total lack of knowledge toward both Wang and sinker

    andrenomo 於 2009/06/15 15:51 回覆

  • dan
  • 但如果如該篇所說王改變配球或不要太倚賴伸卡
    對他不會有幫助嗎?
  • Dorasaga
  • Sorry to hear that you still need to bother a neighbor for a TV... I thought you are now an American. Every American needs a TV, even without the analogue.

    Now, Mr. Wong (the analyst). He's a rare breed among independent bloggers nowadays, the few who rely heavily on his experience and observation.

    Whether it's false or pretense ("fan goggle" or "coolaid"), let's go through his points and throw him out play by play, if necessary.

    Here we go...

    On Wang's strategy an self-conscious:
    "2-seamer或所謂的伸卡其倚賴度是上了大聯盟才開始的。"

    On Wang's latest(6/12) game:
    "狀況最佳的滑球變成止血劑,不會覺得太可惜嗎?"

    Analysis:
    "王建民在決策過程毫無決斷權,讓自己一壞再壞"

    Cause-and-Effect:
    "這過程有兩個主要現象,... [1.] 壓低球路,...只是location過於集中"
    "[2.] 保送...揮臂角度不穩定造成的,而這是2005年也有的現象"

    http://blog.roodo.com/baseballwon/archives/9213243.html

    What's your say, Gentlemen?
  • Well I'm only spending the summer here and I can still watch TV by going to the next room so it's no big deal.

    I'm sorry but I'm not really sure about your point.
    What's the point quoting those thing up there? Are you agreeing with the article?
    If that's the case, I won't even try to convince you cuz that'd be impossible because you've to have at least a little basic idea about who's Chien-Ming Wang and what is a sinker. I will still talk about it later though.

    andrenomo 於 2009/06/17 05:30 回覆

  • Dorasaga
  • Yeah, the America = TV thing is a joke. I think you got it...

    Umm... Agree? Did I ever say so?

    I believe the virtue of addressing the problem "to the point."

    I believe I made my it clear: Even experience and observation can come with prejudice. (Maybe I didn't.)

    Prejudice is a weird thing. We don't like an article, or even the author, then we will reject the whole. But I wonder if it's the problem of the "parts."

    I was trying to simplify Wong's article, and condense it: Make a 3 minute read into 20 seconds.

    And you already did a thorough look at Wong's problems in your latest article. Good job.

    See, underlied the conclusions (in that 4 parts I mentioned above, the core of his article), Wong's logic is coherent, by itself. His problem here lies with what he's looking for do not fit advanced baseball (MLB), because he's relying on "common sense" that cannot address Wang (the pitcher)'s case.
  • 所以我有說我看不太懂你表達的意思是什麼並且用問句問你是否同意該文囉。不過基本上看到第一個quote就知道這篇後面大概全部完蛋了:
    "2-seamer或所謂的伸卡其倚賴度是上了大聯盟才開始的。"
    因為完全不是這樣,王是開始倚賴伸卡之後才有機會上大聯盟的,不然搞不好連九月擴編都還沒摸到就要回台灣來了。

    andrenomo 於 2009/06/18 07:44 回覆