Lost control of the sinker lead to a disastrous start.

 

(註:中英部分大意相同,可直接看中文即可)

Nothing new here. Wang just can't be effective without his sinker working. First inning, with the Red Sox hitters out there swinging at his sinkers, Wang got 3 grounders with his sinkers and splitter. When he found himself not able to throw his sinker for strikes in the second, his off-speed offering just can't turn things around. As he tried to put away Nava with a splitter but Nava pounded it off the wall. Wang came close with his breaking pitches against Stephen Drew, who hits a catchable line drive to right field but misplayed by Jose Bautista. That's about as far his off-speed offerings can take him without the sinker but unfortunately the defensive support didn't come along when most needed. After getting two outs on one pitch, a sinker of course, somehow Wang just didn't give his sinker another shot, especially after Pedroia swung through the only sinker he saw in the at-bat, and went with the off-speed again and Pedroia sent the pitch over the green monster and knocked Wang out of the game.

Wang did make some progress on his off-speed pitches but they haven't become consistently reliable. None of them can be used to attack hitters on any given day. Sure that with his sinker not as good and the hitters are therefore more likely to make solid contact against them, as Salty and Ellsbury sent it right back to the middle, Wang has to establish his sinker. Pitching backwards and go back to his sinker to finish the at-bat is also an option, as he did with Ortiz. However, due to the lack of control of the sinker, Wang had no choice but reversed the roles of his sinker and off-speed pitches and the result got ugly.

 

老調重彈。伸卡在人在,伸卡亡人亡。第二局伸卡控不住了,變化球無法扭轉局面(Nava, Drew, Pedroia),Drew的打席已經差不多是在沒有伸卡當主坦的情況下,王平常的變化球能做到的最多了,但又剛好遇上Baustista雪上加霜的守備。加上伸卡威力不若以往導致犯錯空間變小,被咬中的機會提高(Salty, Ellsbury),就形成了慘烈核爆。我唯一不喜歡的是,雖然的確伸卡控得很差,但最後對Pedroia時其實可以再做嘗試(前一打席抓到Victorino這一打席也讓Pedroia揮空),但一個失控的變化球就被送過大牆。不過就算這樣可能頂多也不過把1.2局7分變成3.2局7分就是了。

王的變化球是有進步,但在一般的日子裡仍不能用以主戰。需要在伸卡建立後來穩固戰局,或倒投讓伸卡發揮功效。但王今天失去伸卡控球後,兩者都做不到。被迫調換兩者角色,結果就是爆炸。至於一堆人很喜歡爭的王應該要怎樣才對(包括提升球速、多練球種、加強某球種),王不是23、24歲還在發展的年輕人,說難聽點只是另一版本的何不食肉糜罷了。他若做得到,隨便一種都有效。

 

創作者介紹

The Tornado

andrenomo 發表在 痞客邦 留言(6) 人氣()


留言列表 (6)

發表留言
  • Justin
  • 感謝分析 ! 真希望能常看到您的文章 XD
  • Justin
  • 願不願意談談 Taiwan's Next Hope : 曾仁和 ? XD
  • A young prospect, still long way to go (not even signed yet). Nothing different than any other prospect. Also, I know him personally, not all that well though, so I might avoid doing so just like many other players that I know.

    andrenomo 於 2013/07/08 14:45 回覆

  • .........
  • 至於一堆人很喜歡爭的王應該要怎樣才對(包括提升球速、多練球種、加強某球種),王不是23、24歲還在發展的年輕人,說難聽點只是另一版本的何不食肉糜罷了。他若做得到,隨便一種都有效。
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    推這段話,一堆人只會講些廢話。
    然後天真的以為sinker不行,多投變化就好,或者把他那鳥變化球當成06ˋ07年的sinker來丟.....在sinker的stuff回不來後變化球當然要更適時適量的出來,但絕不是跟sinker調換投。

    要不然就是以為多丟一點變化球就是所謂的配球靈活。

    在他sinker失去stuff後,江山就去了一大半。
  • 劉莊
  • "滑球影響伸卡" is now cast in the stone.
    劉志昇 莊勝雄籲建仔:.... this is officially in Taiwan baseball bible.

    I bet most of the fans believe that now.
  • 訪客
  • 看到樓上的文,覺得台灣棒球真是可悲...
    劉之前不是還聘請一個團隊搞baseball science(還是我搞錯人)?有搞卻沒有懂?

    球路相衝論這種東西,無論科學或者實際比賽選手的比賽樣本統計應該都無法證明吧?
    甚至該說一堆明擺著擁有sinker&slider的好投手。

    球評都這模樣,也難苛求一般球迷為何會有一大堆錯誤觀念...
  • 訪客
  • 假如會這樣,那也只是王葛格或者莊勝雄本身的問題,實在不能推論出兩種球路相衝的結論。

    不過也不否認,有可能是霉體或其他人誤解及加油添醋。